Abror Khalimov, an individual entrepreneur of the Kibray district, applied to the regional branch of the Antimonopoly Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the Tashkent region. In his appeal, he indicated that the building of the commercial store, located at the address: Kibray, MFU G. Gulom, st. A. Navoi, 1a, JSC “Tashkent Regional Electric Networks” was arbitrarily connected to the employees of the Kibrai TETK, as a result of which document No. 272448-000063 was issued, noted that the debt was accrued in the amount of 114,167,880 sum.
The request was considered by the regional department of the Antimonopoly Committee in the Tashkent region. In the course of the study, an agreement No. 2444-1089 dated October 8, 2019 was drawn up between “Tashkent HETK” JSC and an entrepreneur on the connection of legal entities and individuals to the power grid. Based on this agreement, it was established that the payment was made by the entrepreneur Abror Khalimov, and an application No. 13784051 dated 10/28/2019 was submitted through the my.gov.uz website to fill in the electricity metering system and conclude an electricity supply contract.
In this case, the work was carried out by Abror Khalimov within the framework of the requirements “On the approval of the Administrative Regulations for the provision of public services for connection to engineering and communication networks”, approved by the Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. 256 dated March 31, 2018. However, the management of JSC “Tashkent HETK” did not complete the filling of meters and the contract for the supply of electricity on time.
A case was initiated against JSC “Tashkent regional electric networks” by the regional administration of the anti-monopoly committee of the Tashkent region. According to the decision of the special commission, the requirements of the third paragraph of the first part of Article 16 of the Law “On natural monopolies” of the Republic of Uzbekistan were found to be violated, and the total amount of 114167880 was considered unreasonable. The execution of the instruction was carried out, and the total debt of 114167880 soums, considered unjustified and was written off.
